Berlin Coat Manufacturing Co.

7 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated
340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965) Cited 76 times
Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees
N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.
307 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 52 times
In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.
N.L.R.B. v. Wonder State Manufacturing Company
344 F.2d 210 (8th Cir. 1965) Cited 27 times
Finding award of one week's pay to be a gift and not subject to mandatory bargaining
N.L.R.B. v. Lexington Chair Company
361 F.2d 283 (4th Cir. 1966) Cited 24 times
No. 10000. Argued November 4, 1965. Decided May 6, 1966. Allen M. Hutter, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. R.D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N.C. (Douglas, Ravenel, Josey Hardy, Greensboro, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, District Judge. MICHIE, District Judge. This case comes before
National Labor Rel. Board v. J.H. Allison Co.
165 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1948) Cited 44 times
No. 10411. January 26, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board, for enforcement of its order directing J.H. Allison Co. to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively concerning so-called "merit wage increases" with a labor union, as exclusive representative and bargaining agent of its production workers and to grant no merit wage increases to such employees without prior consultation with the union
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
346 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1965) Cited 17 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co., 346 F.2d 936, 939 (5th Cir. 1965), the court stated, "When the General Counsel charges that an employer has committed an unfair labor practice, he must produce substantial evidence from which it may be inferred that a violation of the Act took place.

Berlin Coat Manufacturing Co.

7 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.

In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.

N.L.R.B. v. Wonder State Manufacturing Company

Finding award of one week's pay to be a gift and not subject to mandatory bargaining

N.L.R.B. v. Lexington Chair Company

National Labor Rel. Board v. J.H. Allison Co.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

In N.L.R.B. v. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co., 346 F.2d 936, 939 (5th Cir. 1965), the court stated, "When the General Counsel charges that an employer has committed an unfair labor practice, he must produce substantial evidence from which it may be inferred that a violation of the Act took place.