§

Benedictine Health Center, Benedictine Sisters Benevolent Association, Benedictine Health Services,

18-CA-196456 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 27, 2017)
Benedictine Health Center, Benedictine Sisters Benevolent Association, Benedictine Health Services,

3 Cited authorities

  1. Clarke v. American Commerce Nat. Bank

    974 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 259 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that billing correspondence is not protected unless it `also reveal the motive of the client in seeking representation, litigation strategy, or the specific nature of the services provided, such as researching particular areas of law'

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.

    102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."

  3. National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro

    81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"