§

Ben Peckin Corp.

181 N.L.R.B. 1025 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Ben Peckin Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fulton Lodge No. 2 of the International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nix

    415 F.2d 212 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 50 times
    Discussing the variety of circumstances where theSalzhandler rationale has been applied

  2. Santa Fe Drilling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 25 times

    No. 22923. September 18, 1969. James N. Adler (argued) Roderick M. Hills, of Munger, Tolles, Hills Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Ronald Wm. Egnor (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Central

  3. Indiana Gear Works v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 273 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 23 times
    Posting of ridiculing cartoons merely part of pattern of habitual sarcastic reflections

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  5. N.L.R.B. v. R.C. Can Company

    340 F.2d 433 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 21 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. R.C. Can Company, 340 F.2d 433 (5th Cir. 1965), the employee went to the plant after he was laid off, and, accompanied by two other employees (the three of them being the members of the bargaining committee), sought out the plant manager in his office and secured entry without telling the purpose of the visit.

  6. Bowling Green Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    416 F.2d 371 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 2 times

    No. 18491. September 26, 1969. James H. Lucas, Bowling Green, Ky., for petitioner; Harlin, Parker, Ricketts, Lucas English, Bowling Green, Ky., on brief. William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge. McALLISTER

  7. National Labor Board v. Clearwater Finishing

    203 F.2d 938 (4th Cir. 1953)   Cited 8 times

    No. 6570. Argued April 15, 1953. Decided May 1, 1953. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Thomas R. Haley, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a

  8. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,062 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB