Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

Machinists Local v. Labor Board

Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

In Retail Clerks International Assn. v. NLRB, supra, MR. CHIEF JUSTICE (then Circuit Judge) BURGER explained the Board's policy on "managerial employees": "The Board also excludes from the protections of the Act, as managerial employees, 'those who formulate, determine, and effectuate an employer's policies,' AFL-CIO, [120 N.L.R.B. 969, 973 (1958)], and those who have discretion in the performance of their jobs, but not if the discretion must conform to an employer's established policy, Eastern Camera and Photo Corp., 140 N.L.R.B. 569, 571 (1963) (store managers who could set prices are not managerial).

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.