§

B&C Contracting Co.

334 N.L.R.B. 218 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
B&C Contracting Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.

    516 U.S. 85 (1995)   Cited 85 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding "employee," as defined by the NLRA, "does not exclude paid union organizers"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Ultrasystems Western v. N.L.R.B

    18 F.3d 251 (4th Cir. 1994)   Cited 14 times
    Discussing the distinction the NLRB draws between these two concepts

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.

    102 F.3d 818 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 10 times
    Noting that the only argument raised on appeal — that applicants who wrote "volunteer union organizer" on applications were not bona fide employees under the Act — was specifically rejected by the Supreme Court in N.L.R.B. v. Town Country Elec., Inc., 516 U.S. 85, ___, 116 S.Ct. 450, 457, 133 L.Ed.2d 371

  6. Architectural Glass Metal v. N.L.R.B

    107 F.3d 426 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that a NLRB determination of the validity of a policy asserted as a nondiscriminatory reason for refusing to hire an applicant, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo

  7. Clow Water Systems Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    92 F.3d 441 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 95-5656, 95-5799. Argued May 21, 1996. Decided and Filed August 19, 1996. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 Frank H. Stewart (argued and briefed), David H. Peck, Taft, Stettinius Hollister, Cincinnati, OH, William F. Gardner (briefed), Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas O'Neal, Birmingham, AL, for Petitioner. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Linda Dreeben (briefed), Appellate Court Branch, Meredith L. Jason (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC

  8. Tualatin Elect. v. National Lab. Relations Bd.

    84 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 93-70775, 93-70843 Submitted March 4, 1996 — Portland, Oregon The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4. Filed May 29, 1996 Thomas M. Triplett, Schwabe, Williamson Wyatt, Portland, Oregon, for the petitioner, cross-respondent. David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the respondent