Baystate Franklin Medical Center

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 142 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum
  3. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 181 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  7. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  8. Three D, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    629 F. App'x 33 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that something "violates [the NLRA's interference provision] if it would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their [NLRA rights]"
  9. Munir v. Scott

    12 F.3d 213 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 19 times
    Listing substantially similar factors
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Mini-Togs, Inc.

    980 F.2d 1027 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 19 times

    No. 91-5057. January 12, 1993. Robert Herman, Aileen A. Armstrong, Charles Donnelly, Dep. Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David Hagaman, Robert E. Rigrish, Clark, Paul, Hoover Mallard, Atlanta, Ga., for Mini-Togs, Inc. H. Frank Malone, Dir., Region 15, N.L.R.B., New Orleans, La., for Other Interested Parties. Appeal from National Labor Relations Board. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOHNSON

  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,217 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”