§

Bayliner Marine Corp.

215 N.L.R.B. 12 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Bayliner Marine Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Associated Press v. Labor Board

    301 U.S. 103 (1937)   Cited 257 times
    Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Miller Redwood Company

    407 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 42 times

    No. 22573. February 25, 1969. Herbert Fishgold, Washington, D.C. (argued), Janet Kohn, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Carrell F. Bradley (argued), of Schwenn, Bradley Batchelor, Hillsboro, Or., for respondent. Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and CHAMBERS and CARTER, Circuit Judges. J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge, United

  4. Betts Baking Co. v. N.L.R.B

    380 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 32 times

    No. 8813. May 26, 1967. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (O.B. Eidson, Philip H. Lewis, James W. Porter, Charles S. Fisher, Jr., Charles N. Henson, Peter F. Caldwell, R. Austin Northern, Roscoe E. Long and Brock R. Snyder, Topeka, Kan., on brief), for petitioner. Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, HICKEY, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge

  5. Santa Fe Drilling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 25 times

    No. 22923. September 18, 1969. James N. Adler (argued) Roderick M. Hills, of Munger, Tolles, Hills Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Ronald Wm. Egnor (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Central

  6. Famet, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 15 times

    No. 73-1832. December 27, 1973. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1974. Herbert S. Matthews, South San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner cross-respondent. Elliot Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D. C., Roy O. Hoffman, Regional Director, NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Charles I. Cohen, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent cross-petitioner. International Ass'n. of Machinists Aerospace

  7. Raser Tanning Company v. N.L.R.B

    276 F.2d 80 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 16 times

    No. 13790. March 29, 1960. Certiorari Denied June 20, 1960. See 80 S.Ct. 1601. M. Reese Dill, Cleveland, Ohio (of Merkel, Campbell, Dill Zetzer, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin Welles, Cleveland, Ohio (Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Frederick U. Reel, Alfred Avins, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Regional Director Phillip Fusco, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before MARTIN, CECIL and WEICK, Circuit Judges. CECIL, Circuit Judge. The

  8. Robertshaw Controls Co. v. N.L.R.B

    483 F.2d 762 (4th Cir. 1973)   Cited 4 times

    No. 72-1518. Argued December 6, 1972. Decided August 30, 1973. Paul M. Thompson, Richmond, Va. (Francis V. Lowden, Jr., Hill B. Wellford, Jr., and Hunton, Williams, Gay Gibson, Richmond, Va., on brief), for petitioner. Bruce McLean, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, N.L.R.B., on brief), for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BOREMAN, Senior Circuit

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Tepper

    297 F.2d 280 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Processing of milk by an employer who was primarily a processor and processed milk from other farms not included under exemption