Bay Counties District Council of Carpenters, Etc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
  2. Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 51 times
    In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.
  3. Intnl. U., Ele., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    307 F.2d 679 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 24 times

    Nos. 16273 and 16301. Argued January 4, 1962. Decided June 7, 1962. Petition for Rehearing Denied in No. 16,273 July 5, 1962. Certiorari Denied December 10, 1962. See 83 S.Ct. 307. Mr. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 16273. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Philadelphia Iron Works, Inc.

    211 F.2d 937 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 25 times
    Noting that hiring practices after a grievance was filed "would be a factor for the board's consideration" but that the NLRB easily could reason that subsequent hiring practices were reactionary to the grievance and did not accurately reflect the prior hiring arrangement
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Local 776, Iatse (Film Editors)

    303 F.2d 513 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 10 times

    No. 16907. May 10, 1962. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, A. Brummel, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gilbert, Nissen Irvin, Robert W. Gilbert, Beverly Hills, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and YANKWICH, District Judge. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board found that Local 776, International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Eclipse Lumber Co.

    199 F.2d 684 (9th Cir. 1952)   Cited 16 times

    No. 13212. November 12, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls and William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Patterson, Maxwell Jones, Seattle, Wash., for respondent Eclipse Lumber Co. Walthew, Gershon, Oseran Warner, Seattle, Wash., for respondent International Woodworkers of America. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. This

  7. Allen Bradley Company v. N.L.R.B

    286 F.2d 442 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 6 times
    Concluding that the broad power of unions to “prescrib[e] rules relative to the acquisition and retention of its members ... goes beyond any permissible limit when it imposes a sanction upon a member because of his exercise of a right guaranteed by the [National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) ]”
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brotherhood of Painters

    242 F.2d 477 (10th Cir. 1957)   Cited 4 times

    No. 5418. February 26, 1957. Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Stephen Leonard, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C., were on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Hornbein Hornbein and Roy O. Goldin, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondents. Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. LEWIS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, seeks enforcement of a remedial order issued by the