§

Bay Cities Metal Trades Council

306 N.L.R.B. 983 (N.L.R.B. 1992)
Bay Cities Metal Trades Council

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    473 U.S. 95 (1985)   Cited 76 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029

    409 U.S. 213 (1972)   Cited 53 times
    In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ironworkers Local 433

    850 F.2d 551 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 16 times
    In Ironworkers, this circuit rejected the NLRB's conclusion "that any threat to picket a primary employer at a common situs will be conclusively presumed to have an unlawful purpose unless the union proclaims that its picketing will be conducted in a lawful manner."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Construction & General Laborers' Union Local No. 534

    778 F.2d 284 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 10 times
    Reversing Board's decision that a union president's speech amounted to an unfair labor practice and holding it was protected where the president "did not explicitly threaten that [the union] would take some action against persons who file unfair labor practice charges" but instead "the action threatened was action that would have been taken by an independent thir'd party with no instigation or assistance from the Union," his statements did not contain "some implied threat that the Union or its members would take some action against persons who file charges" and the Board did not find his statements were "false"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Local 54, Hotel Rest. Emp. Int'l

    887 F.2d 28 (3d Cir. 1989)   Cited 4 times

    No. 89-3170. Argued September 7, 1989. Decided October 5, 1989. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied November 1, 1989. Carmel P. Ebb (argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bernard N. Katz (argued), Meranze Katz, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MANSMANN, NYGAARD and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT ALDISERT, Circuit Judge. This is another in a line of recent cases before the National Labor Relations Board presenting

  7. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    865 F.2d 791 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 4 times
    Noting that the Sixth Circuit has consistently "relied on Pattern Makers' as establishing the high degree of deference due the Board's interpretation of the Act."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Office Pro. Emp. Int. U., Local

    902 F.2d 1164 (4th Cir. 1990)   Cited 2 times
    In NLRB v. Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 2, 902 F.2d 1164, 1165-66 (4th Cir. 1990), Janet Love was an employee who had resigned from the union in a state with a right-to-work law, but was then transferred within the same bargaining unit to another state and forced to rejoin under a union security clause in the collective bargaining agreement, since the new state did not have a right-to-work law.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Miller

    341 F.2d 870 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 274, 306, Dockets 29186, 29296. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided March 1, 1965. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City (Michael P. Graff, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board