§

Bath Iron Works Corp.

345 N.L.R.B. 499 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Bath Iron Works Corp.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 309 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  3. Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 29 times
    Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances

  4. Bonnell/Tredegar Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    46 F.3d 339 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 29 times
    Implying Christmas bonus formula into CBA based on employer's prior, long standing conduct

  5. BP Amoco Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    217 F.3d 869 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 18 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statement in a collective-bargaining agreement that "Benefit plans for the Company ... will continue in force during the life of this Agreement" was sufficient to incorporate the company’s health-insurance plan by reference (alteration in original)

  6. Honeywell Intern., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    253 F.3d 119 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 8 times
    Holding the Board's cursory departure from precedent rendered its decision arbitrary and capricious

  7. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    765 F.2d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer is prohibited "from altering contractual terms concerning mandatory subjects of bargaining during the life of a collective bargaining agreement without the consent of the union"

  8. Mary Thompson Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    943 F.2d 741 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that a union was entitled to a sales and transfer agreement "in order to verify the data it obtained through alternative sources"

  9. Exxon Research Engineering Co. v. N.L.R.B

    89 F.3d 228 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-60358. July 16, 1996. Stephen W. Smith, Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, TX, for respondents. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Peter David Winkler, Julie Brock Broido, National labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Michael Dunn, Director, National Labor Relations Board, Fort Worth, TX, for NLRB. Howard Shapiro, McCalla, Thompson, Pyburn, Hymowitz Shapiro, New Orleans, LA, for The Thrift Plan of Exxon Corporation, A Part of the Benefit Plan of Exxon Corporation and participating

  10. N.L.R.B. v. C C Plywood Corp.

    351 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 8 times
    In C C Plywood the Supreme Court said that the disputed contract provision, in dealing with increases for "particular employee[s]", did not authorize a unilateral increase for a group of employees which would invalidate previously negotiated wage differentials.

  11. Section 185 - Suits by and against labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 185   Cited 14,643 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal district courts jurisdiction over breach of contract claims arising out of collective bargaining contracts

  12. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,039 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB