Barron Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.

American Hospital Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
499 U.S. 606 (1991) Cited 167 times
Holding that statements in committee reports were not binding on the agency and do not "ha[ve] the force of law, for the Constitution is quite explicit about the procedure that Congress must follow in legislating"
International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988) Cited 119 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice
RC Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
326 F.3d 235 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 10 times
Explaining features of single-employer status in context of mandatory bargaining
Morand Bros. Bev. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
190 F.2d 576 (7th Cir. 1951) Cited 33 times
No. 10335. July 23, 1951. Samuel L. Golan, Chester F. McNamara, Leonard W. Golan, all of Chicago, Ill., Golan Golan, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Bernard Dunau, N.L.R.B., all of Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, Benjamin A. Theeman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. George O. Bahrs, San Francisco, Cal., Arthur C. Rooney, Chicago, Ill., Eli E. Dorsey, Seattle, Wash., Robert P. Patterson