§
Barnard College

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. N.L.R.B.v. Talsol Corp.

    155 F.3d 785 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that an employee's comments about safety at a group meeting attended by employees and management constituted concerted activity because the meeting was conducted to address plant safety concerns, the employee's questions were on the topic of safety, and the context indicated that the employee's statements were “[c]learly ... not purely personal gripes”

  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    338 F.3d 267 (4th Cir. 2003)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that "an employee . . . can lose protections if his conduct is so egregious as to take it outside the protection of the Act, or of such a character as to render the employee unfit for further service"

  5. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    667 F.2d 470 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that employer did not violate employee's right to union representation at investigatory interview where employer requested that the representative not interfere with questioning because the representative was present at the interview, was allowed time to consult with the employee prior to the interview, and was free to make any additions, suggestions, or clarifications after the interview

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Texaco, Inc.

    659 F.2d 124 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 6 times

    No. 80-7692. Argued and Submitted August 6, 1981. Decided October 16, 1981. Rehearing Denied November 20, 1981. Joseph A. Schwachter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued), for petitioner; Howard E. Perlstein, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. William D. Evans, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges and HATFIELD, District Judge. Honorable Paul G. Hatfield, United States District