§

Baltimore Lithographers, Local 2-P

160 N.L.R.B. 1204 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Baltimore Lithographers, Local 2-P

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C

    191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 44 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating § 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."

  5. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    237 F.2d 20 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 12891, 12931. Argued March 14, 1956. Decided June 22, 1956. Rehearing Denied September 13, 1956. Petition for Rehearing Denied September 13, 1956. Second Petition for Rehearing Denied October 8, 1956. Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied October 8, 1956. Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Martin F. O'Donoghue and Thomas X. Dunn, Washington, D.C., were on the briefs, for petitioner in No

  6. Meat Hwy. Drivers, Etc., U. L. v. N.L.R.B

    348 F.2d 803 (D.C. Cir. 1965)

    No. 18091. Filed July 6, 1965. Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, in Chambers. PER CURIAM: On September 11, 1964, this court decreed that "the Board's order, * * * insofar as it pertains to the work standards clause, is remanded to the Board for decision in the light of the Court's opinion." Instead of deciding the work standards clause issue on the record already made, the Board, on December 3, 1964, issued an order reopening the record and remanding the proceeding

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"