Bally Case and Cooler, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

Brooks v. Labor Board
348 U.S. 96 (1954) Cited 300 times
Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Garment Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 731 (1961) Cited 213 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support
N.L.R.B. v. Yutana Barge Lines, Inc.
315 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1963) Cited 17 times
No. 16966. March 25, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel; Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and Elliott Moore, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. D.A. Burr, G.F. Boney, and Theodore M. Pease, Jr., Anchorage, Alaska, for respondent. Before JERTBERG, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Coach Body Company
336 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 14 times
No. 20744. September 14, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Paula Omansky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. M.A. Prowell, Frank A. Constangy, Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. Senior Circuit Judge of the First Circuit, sitting by designation. GEWIN, Circuit Judge. This petition seeks enforcement of an
N.L.R.B. v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co.
359 F.2d 799 (7th Cir. 1966) Cited 12 times
In NLRB v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co., 359 F.2d 799, 800 (7th Cir. 1966), the evidence showed a narrow margin of victory by the union in an election two years earlier and high employee turnover.

Bally Case and Cooler, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

Brooks v. Labor Board

Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

Labor Board v. Parts Co.

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Garment Workers v. Labor Board

Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

N.L.R.B. v. Yutana Barge Lines, Inc.

N.L.R.B. v. Southern Coach Body Company

N.L.R.B. v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co.

In NLRB v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co., 359 F.2d 799, 800 (7th Cir. 1966), the evidence showed a narrow margin of victory by the union in an election two years earlier and high employee turnover.