§

Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., Inc.

288 N.L.R.B. 620 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

    732 F.2d 1349 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs," where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Windsor Industries, Inc.

    730 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 13 times

    No. 355, Docket 83-4135. Argued December 15, 1983. Decided March 13, 1984. Joseph F. Frankl, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Peter Winkler, Atty., Washington, D.C.) for petitioner. Clifford P. Chaiet, Jericho, N.Y. (Pearl Chaiet, P.C., Jericho, N.Y.), for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.

    340 F.2d 568 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 28 times

    No. 21110. January 11, 1965. Lawrence Gold, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert A. Armstrong, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Henry L. Scott, Houston, Tex., Trotter, Childs, Fortenbach McClure, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HANNAY, District Judge. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  6. Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    692 F.2d 169 (1st Cir. 1982)   Cited 8 times
    Expressing reluctance "to adopt a rule that would permit the company to launder the `bad' motives of certain of its supervisors by forwarding a dispassionate report to a neutral superior"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill

    308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times

    No. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §

  8. N.L.R.B. v. United Mineral Chemical Corp.

    391 F.2d 829 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In United Mineral & Chemical Corp., the Second Circuit stated that the fact-finder could validly conclude based on witness testimony that the theft had not occurred. 391 F.2d at 833.

  9. A.J. Krajewski Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 673 (1st Cir. 1969)   Cited 11 times

    No. 7224. Heard April 8, 1969. Decided July 17, 1969. William J. Sheehan, Providence, R.I., for petitioner. Eugene B. Granof, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David C. Nevins, Atty., Washington, D.C. were on brief, for N.L.R.B., respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge. On August 24, 1966, Michael Andreoli was called to the

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Teknor-Apex Company

    468 F.2d 692 (1st Cir. 1972)   Cited 3 times

    No. 72-1115. Argued September 7, 1972. Decided October 13, 1972. William L. Corbett, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. Vernon C. Stoneman, Boston, Mass., with whom Seth M. Kalberg, Jr., and Stoneman Chandler, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE, Circuit Judge, and HAMLEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Of the

  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,870 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions