B & W Construction Co.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution
  2. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Loc. 294, Int'l Bro. of Teamsters

    470 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 7 times

    No. 28, Docket 72-1155. Argued October 4, 1972. Decided December 5, 1972. Irving L. Hurwitz, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Harry Pozefsky, Gloversville, N.Y. (Pozefsky Tocci, Gloversville, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MOORE, FEINBERG and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges. MOORE, Circuit Judge: The National

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Un., Operating

    420 F.2d 961 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 3 times

    No. 17859. Argued January 6, 1970. Decided January 28, 1970. Corinna Lothar Metcalf, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Earl S. Aronson, Newark, N.J. (Thomas E. Durkin, Jr., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, ALDISERT and STAHL, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations