B & M Excavating, Inc.
4 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey
233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956) Cited 133 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).
Walls Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B
321 F.2d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 23 timesHolding that complaint to state health department was protected conduct given lack of evidence that "the allegations were made with intent to falsify or maliciously injure the [employer]"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.
349 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1965) Cited 7 timesIn Tanner, supra, two employees were discharged for picketing their employer in protest over its racially discriminatory hiring practices.
N.L.R.B. v. Browning
268 F.2d 938 (10th Cir. 1959) Cited 3 timesNo. 6031. July 14, 1959. Earle W. Putnam, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. James C. Ritchie, Albuquerque, N.M. (Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin Robb, Albuquerque, N.M., with him on the brief), for respondents. Before MURRAH, PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. PICKETT