§
Avaya Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Packet Intelligence LLC v. NetScout Sys.

    965 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2020)   Cited 59 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Reversing damages award based on device sales which was not tied to the internal use of the claimed methods

  2. Trading Techs. Int'l, Inc. v. IBG LLC

    921 F.3d 1084 (Fed. Cir. 2019)   Cited 31 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that three patents relating to electronic trading systems were ineligible under § 101 ; the claimed inventions improved only the trader , and not the functioning of the computer

  3. NetSoc, LLC v. Match Grp.

    No. 2020-1195 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 31, 2020)   Cited 7 times
    In NetSoc, LLC v. Match Grp., LLC, 838 F. App'x 544 (Fed. Cir. 2020), the Federal Circuit considered claims for "establishing a social network" that consisted of "maintaining a list" of participants, "presenting a user with an interface from which the user makes a selection" from several different categories, and then "displaying, for the user, some of the information associated" with other users "which match the selection of the category by the [first] user" and "enabling the [first] user to send an inquiry message to one or more" of the other users to chat.

  4. Hyatt v. Dudas

    551 F.3d 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2008)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that the final judgment rule applies in section 145 cases

  5. Section 101 - Inventions patentable

    35 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 3,530 times   2291 Legal Analyses
    Defining patentable subject matter as "any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof."

  6. Section 6 - Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 6   Cited 188 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Giving the Director authority to designate "at least 3 members of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board" to review "[e]ach appeal, derivation proceeding, post-grant review, and inter partes review"

  7. Section 134 - Appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    35 U.S.C. § 134   Cited 98 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) PATENT APPLICANT.-An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. (b) PATENT OWNER.-A patent owner in a reexamination may appeal from the final rejection of any claim by the primary examiner to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, having once paid the fee for such appeal. 35 U.S.C. § 134 July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 98-622

  8. Section 41.37 - Appeal brief

    37 C.F.R. § 41.37   Cited 32 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Requiring identification of support in specification and, for means-plus-function limitations, corresponding structure as well

  9. Section 1.136 - [Effective until 1/19/2025] Extensions of time

    37 C.F.R. § 1.136   Cited 17 times   30 Legal Analyses

    (a) (1) If an applicant is required to reply within a nonstatutory or shortened statutory time period, applicant may extend the time period for reply up to the earlier of the expiration of any maximum period set by statute or five months after the time period set for reply, if a petition for an extension of time and the fee set in § 1.17(a) are filed, unless: (i) Applicant is notified otherwise in an Office action; (ii) The reply is a reply brief submitted pursuant to § 41.41 of this title; (iii)

  10. Section 1.42 - Applicant for patent

    37 C.F.R. § 1.42   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) The word "applicant" when used in this title refers to the inventor or all of the joint inventors, or to the person applying for a patent as provided in §§ 1.43 , 1.45 , or 1.46 . (b) If a person is applying for a patent as provided in § 1.46 , the word "applicant" refers to the assignee, the person to whom the inventor is under an obligation to assign the invention, or the person who otherwise shows sufficient proprietary interest in the matter, who is applying for a patent under § 1.46 and