Autoprod, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
  3. N.L.R.B. v. General Stencils, Inc.

    438 F.2d 894 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 38 times
    In General Stencils we compared and contrasted cases involving coercive interrogation, threats to close plants, discriminatory discharges, loss of benefits and the like, id. at 903, with the facts in General Stencils, which principally involved unlawful interrogation of one employee about his statement to a Board agent, coupled with threats to a few employees to withdraw benefits of a relatively minor nature.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.

    358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 26 times
    In Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Scoler's Incorporated

    466 F.2d 1289 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 15 times

    No. 717, Docket 71-2217. Argued June 28, 1972. Decided September 11, 1972. Rehearing Denied October 23, 1972. Charles N. Steele, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael F. Messitte, Atty., NLRB, of counsel), for petitioner. Emanuel N. Psarakis, Hartford, Conn. (Sorokin, Sorokin, Hurwitz, Wetstone Psarakis, Hartford, Conn.), for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MOORE, SMITH and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges