Teachers v. Hudson

Holding that the First Amendment restrains government-compelled exactions of money

Communications Workers of America v. Beck

Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

Machinists v. Street

Holding that because the individual Street plaintiffs "have in the course of [this action] made known to their respective unions their objection to the use of their money for the support of political causes . . . the respective unions were without power to use payments thereafter tendered by them for such political causes"

Labor Board v. General Motors

Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

Railway Clerks v. Allen

Holding that, under the RLA, unions are not permitted to spend nonmembers' dues on political activities

Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.

Abrams v. Communications Workers of America

Finding that thirty-day window period for objecting to fees was not unduly burdensome

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"

Thomas v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Page 651

Upholding "local union" presumption, in which local union relies on national union expenditures in estimating share of expenses devoted to collective bargaining activities, if adequately justified by circumstances

Penrod v. N.L.R.B

Holding that Hudson requires a union to explain how its affiliate used money that was ultimately charged to the nonmembers