§

Auto Workers Local 735 (General Motors)

310 N.L.R.B. 1087 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Auto Workers Local 735 (General Motors)

4 Cited authorities

  1. The Ansul Co. v. Uniroyal, Inc.

    404 U.S. 1018 (1972)   Cited 54 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 71-537, 71-539. January 11, 1972, OCTOBER TERM, 1971. Facts and opinion, D.C., 301 F.Supp. 273; 306 F.Supp. 541; 448 F.2d 872. C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 448 F. 2d 872.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Laborers Intern., North America

    567 F.2d 833 (8th Cir. 1977)   Cited 6 times

    No. 77-1217. Submitted November 14, 1977. Decided December 28, 1977. John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert G. Sewell and Chris W. Katzenbach (argued), Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner, N.L.R.B. James E. Spain, Bloomfield, Mo., argued for respondent, Laborers Intern. Union of North America, Local 282. Samuel C. Ebling (argued), John B. Lewis and James E. Robertson

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bulletin Co.

    443 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 9 times

    No. 19058. Argued April 22, 1971. Decided June 11, 1971. Charles R. Both, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant Gen. Counsel, Abigail Cooley Baskir, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert H. Kleeb, Morgan, Lewis Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa. (Peter D. Walther, Mark S. Dichter, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent, Bulletin Co. Bernard N. Katz, Meranze, Katz, Spear and Bielitsky

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second