Auto Workers Local 95

8 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,216 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
  2. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,079 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
  3. Teachers v. Hudson

    475 U.S. 292 (1986)   Cited 408 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment restrains government-compelled exactions of money
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 882 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
  5. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 279 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"
  6. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 24 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that in challenge to extra-unit fees, litigation expenses were "treated separately by the parties but [are] analytically identical, as far as we can see"
  7. Price v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

    927 F.2d 88 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that union's duty of fair representation was not implicated in employee-union dispute
  8. Finerty v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    113 F.3d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 10 times

    No. 96-1348 Argued April 22, 1997 Decided June 3, 1997 Glenn M. Taubman, Roslyn, NY, argued the cause and filed the briefs, for petitioners. Jill A. Griffin, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent, with whom Howard E. Perlstein, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, were on the brief. Frederick Havard, Supervisory Attorney, Washington, DC, entered an appearance. James