Austal USA

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  2. Torbitt Castleman v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    123 F.3d 899 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 17 times
    Stating that an employee's subjective reaction does not render the challenged conduct unlawful
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Austal USA, LLC

    343 F. App'x 448 (11th Cir. 2009)   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 08-15976. August 25, 2009. Linda Dreeben, Heather Beard, Jill A. Griffin, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Terry Dawson, Hannesson I. Murphy, Barnes Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Respondent. Petition for Review of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Agency Nos. 15-CA-16552, 15-CA-16578. Before CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges and STAGG, District Judge. Honorable Tom Stagg, United States District Judge for the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. PRYOR, Circuit

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Monroe Tube Co., Inc.

    545 F.2d 1320 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 19 times
    Ruling that employer did not interfere with employees' rights by advising them they could withdraw their union authorization cards and by supplying the address of the union headquarters for that purpose
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

    705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-1693. October 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Reliance Steel Products Company

    322 F.2d 49 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 12 times

    No. 19623. August 5, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Leo N. McGuire, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. C.V. Stelzenmuller, Mark L. Taliaferro, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent, Moore, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman Burr, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and POPE and JONES, Circuit Judges. Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation

  7. Dawson Metal Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    450 F.2d 47 (8th Cir. 1971)

    No. 20352. November 3, 1971. Marvin J. Martin, W. Stanley Churchill, Martin, Cooper, Churchill Friedel, Wichita, Kan., for petitioner. Marvin Roth, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Eugene B. Granof, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the NLRB. Before MEHAFFY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and MEREDITH, District Judge. MEREDITH, District Judge. This case is before the Court