§

Aurora and East Denver Trash Disposal

218 N.L.R.B. 1 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Aurora and East Denver Trash Disposal

9 Cited authorities

  1. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ware. Union

    283 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 41 times
    Holding labor union culpable under Taft-Hartley Act for acts performed by its agents, i.e., by union stewards

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Northern California District Council of Hod Carriers & Common Laborers of America

    389 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 21 times

    No. 21569. January 25, 1968. Robert M. Lieber, Washington, D.C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles P. Scully, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, Cal., W. Thomas Arruda, Oakland, Cal., Levy, DeRoy, Geffner Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

    169 F.2d 571 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 46 times
    In NLRB v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 571, 577 (6th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 905, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals specifically rejected the notion that the protection afforded by the National Labor Relations Act is a constitutional right.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Isis Plumbing & Heating Co.

    322 F.2d 913 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18364. September 23, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles and Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before HAMLEY, JERTBERG and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter

  6. Steves Sash Door Company v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.2d 676 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 11 times

    No. 24767. October 3, 1968. Theodore F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Richard S. Rodin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: Steves Sash Door Company petitions this Court pursuant to Section 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., to review and set aside an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board. The Board

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Radcliffe

    211 F.2d 309 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 11 times

    No. 13726. March 3, 1954. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 27, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, H.T. Herrick, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, J.L. Eberle, Boise, Idaho, for respondents. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, POPE, Circuit Judge, and DRIVER, District Judge. DRIVER, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order, based

  8. Tompkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.2d 325 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 2 times

    No. 15392. October 7, 1964. Clarence Evans, Nashville, Tenn., Farris, Evans Evans, Nashville, Tenn., of counsel, for petitioner. Seymour Strongin, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Lee M. Modjeska and Seymour Strongin, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before CECIL, O'SULLIVAN and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges. O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,096 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"