Augusta Bakery Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
388 U.S. 26 (1967) Cited 323 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 234 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Labor Board v. Burnup Sims
379 U.S. 21 (1964) Cited 106 times 21 Legal Analyses
Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 81 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
N.L.R.B. v. Mars Sales Equipment Co.
626 F.2d 567 (7th Cir. 1980) Cited 21 times
No. 79-2082. Argued April 29, 1980. Decided July 21, 1980. Penny Pilzer, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Joseph A. Yocum, Yocum Hahn, Evansville, Ind., for respondent. Before WOOD, Circuit Judge, MARKEY, Chief Judge, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Chief Judge Howard T. Markey of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals is sitting by designation. HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. This appeal involves a National Labor Relations Board application for enforcement of its order
Section 1101 - Definitions
8 U.S.C. § 1101 Cited 16,871 times 92 Legal Analyses
Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
Rule 804 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness
Fed. R. Evid. 804 Cited 4,078 times 32 Legal Analyses
Recognizing an exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule when the party against whom the statement is offered has engaged in wrongdoing which procures the unavailability of the declarant
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,894 times 23 Legal Analyses
Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions

Augusta Bakery Corp.

9 Cited authorities

Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

Recognizing an exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule when the party against whom the statement is offered has engaged in wrongdoing which procures the unavailability of the declarant

Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions