§

Auburn Foundry, Inc.

284 N.L.R.B. 242 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Auburn Foundry, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 416 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge

  2. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Fort Vancouver Plywood Co.

    604 F.2d 596 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 42 times
    In Fort Vancouver, we noted that the Board's order required the reinstatement of exactly 72 discharged workers, leaving no possibility for the employer to litigate whether or not the workers would have been laid off in spite of the violations.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Auburn Foundry, Inc.

    791 F.2d 619 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 1 times

    No. 85-2527. Argued February 14, 1986. Decided May 30, 1986. Rehearing Denied June 25, 1986. Elliot Moore, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John R. Burns, III, Baker, Daniels Shoaff, Fort Wayne, Ind., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before POSNER, FLAUM, and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges. FLAUM, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents a single narrowly defined issue for this court's review: whether this court should refrain from enforcing an NLRB order mandating