§

Atlas Oil Co.

No. 75543196 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 3, 2001)
Atlas Oil Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 190 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  2. In re Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.

    748 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1984)   Cited 18 times
    Finding likelihood of confusion between "Martin's" for bread and "Martin's" for cheese, since the products "travel in the same channels of trade," are sold by the "same retail outlets," and are "often used in combination"

  3. In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc.

    837 F.2d 463 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between furniture and "general merchandise store services," and rejecting the distinction between goods and services as having "little or no legal significance"

  4. Federated Foods v. Fort Howard Paper Co.

    544 F.2d 1098 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the mere existence of modern supermarket containing wide variety or products should not foreclose further inquiry into the likelihood of confusion arising from the use of similar marks on any goods so displayed

  5. Rockwood Chocolate Co. v. Hoffman Candy Co.

    372 F.2d 552 (C.C.P.A. 1967)   Cited 10 times

    Patent Appeal No. 7712. February 16, 1967. A.D. Caesar, Alan H. Bernstein, Stanley H. Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. G. Cabell Busick, Henry W. Leeds, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, RICH, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. SMITH, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in consolidated opposition and cancellation proceedings

  6. Food Specialty Co. v. Kal Kan Foods, Inc.

    487 F.2d 1389 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 2 times

    Patent Appeal No. 9033. December 20, 1973. Robert W. Beach, Seattle, Wash., attorney of record, for appellant; George R. Jones, Beale Jones, Arlington, Va., of counsel. Stephen Grubb, Los Angeles, attorney of record, for appellee; Francis D. Thomas, Jr., Arlington, Va., of counsel. Appeal from the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. RICH, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial

  7. Morrison Milling Co. v. Gen. Mills, Inc.

    436 F.2d 1050 (C.C.P.A. 1971)

    Patent Appeal No. 8385. February 11, 1971. Robert G. McMorrow, Washington, D.C., attorney of record, for appellant. Harold D. Jastram, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee. Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and RE, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting by designation. RE, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board sustaining an opposition by General Mills, Inc. to an application by The Morrison Milling Company to register the following mark for

  8. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,600 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"