§

Atlanta Daily World

179 N.L.R.B. 999 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Atlanta Daily World

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Engineers Fabricators, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    376 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times
    Holding that an issue was not fairly litigated where the allegation was not listed in the complaint and counsel did not understand the relevance of testimony later used to support the uncharged violation

  5. Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    In Town Country Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 316 F.2d 846 (5th Cir. 1963), this Court held that a company which contracted out work in part to rid itself of a union violated the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 et seq.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  7. Cherrin Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    349 F.2d 1001 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 12 times
    In Cherrin, this Court deferred to the Board's finding of a special status in a circumstance in which multiple benefits flowed to an employee by virtue of her familial relationship to management.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Beaver Meadow Creamery

    215 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 11236. Argued May 17, 1954. Decided August 16, 1954. Melvin Spaeth, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank G. Smith, Clearfield, Pa. (Frank A. Whitsett, Clearfield, Pa., Smith, Maine, Whitsett Lee, Clearfield, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY,