§

Atlanta Biltmore Hotel Corp.

128 N.L.R.B. 364 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Atlanta Biltmore Hotel Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Bus Employees v. Wisconsin Board

    340 U.S. 383 (1951)   Cited 134 times
    In Bus Employees v. Wisconsin Board, 340 U.S. 383, this Court held that the Wisconsin Public Utility Anti-Strike Law, which made it a misdemeanor for public utility employees to engage in a strike which would cause an interruption of an essential public utility service, conflicted with the National Labor Relations Act and was therefore invalid under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

  2. Office Employes v. Labor Board

    353 U.S. 313 (1957)   Cited 54 times
    Holding that, when a union acts as an employer, it is deemed an employer within the meaning of the NLRA and subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB

  3. Hotel Employees v. Leedom

    358 U.S. 99 (1958)   Cited 33 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 21. Argued November 10, 1958. Decided November 24, 1958. Dismissal by the National Labor Relations Board of petitioners' representation petition, on the sole ground of the Board's long-established policy of not asserting jurisdiction over the hotel industry as a class, was beyond the Board's power. 101 U.S.App.D.C. 414, 249 F.2d 506, reversed and case remanded. J. W. Brown argued the cause for petitioners.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Protein Blenders

    215 F.2d 749 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 9 times

    No. 14937. September 13, 1954. Arnold Ordman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come and Robert E. Miller, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Newton L. Margulies, Des Moines, Iowa (Leo M. Baker, Harvey E. Minkler, Des Moines, Iowa, on the brief), for respondent. Before GARDNER, Chief Judge, and JOHNSEN and COLLET

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Popeil Bros

    216 F.2d 66 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 3 times

    No. 11102. October 1, 1954. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Ackerberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Chicago, Ill., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Ruth V. Reel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George B. Christensen, Fred H. Daugherty, Chicago, Ill., Winston, Strawn, Black Towner, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for respondent. Before MAJOR, LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This case is here upon