§

Athey Products Corp.

303 N.L.R.B. 92 (N.L.R.B. 1991)
Athey Products Corp.

31 Cited authorities

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.

    415 U.S. 36 (1974)   Cited 2,896 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that workers may bring Title VII discrimination claims in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA

  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills

    353 U.S. 448 (1957)   Cited 2,330 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts

  3. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  4. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  5. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  6. Labor Board v. Rockaway News Co.

    345 U.S. 71 (1953)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that employees may bargain away their statutory right to strike

  7. Village of Penn Yan v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

    454 U.S. 821 (1981)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that it is no search to use binoculars to see display of weapons in lighted office of gas station located on major thoroughfare in commercial district

  8. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

  9. Peerless Roofing Co., Ltd. v. N.L.R.B

    641 F.2d 734 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 42 times
    Holding that the requirements of § 302(c) were satisfied when contributions were made pursuant to expired collective bargaining agreements

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Pacific Grinding Wheel Co., Inc.

    572 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 45 times
    In Pacific Grinding Wheel, the court recognized that "Board disapproval of proposed terms," "a company's adamant insistence on strong pro-management terms," and "rejection by the employer of terms which were in a previous contract" are not sufficient in themselves to establish bad faith, but are factors which may be considered by the Board with other evidence, and that the "totality of the circumstances may justify a finding of failure to bargain in good faith."