12 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Bally's Park Place Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
646 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2011) Cited 42 timesFinding unlawful motive where employee's discharge came only days after manager observed him at pro-union rally
Flex Frac Logistics, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
746 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 2014) Cited 31 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8
King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017) Cited 5 timesNo. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert
Manor Care of Easton, PA., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
661 F.3d 1139 (D.C. Cir. 2011)Nos. 10–1411 11–1011. 2011-11-22 MANOR CARE OF EASTON, PA., LLC, doing business as Manorcare Health Services–Easton, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.Service Employees International Union Healthcare Pennsylvania (SEIU Healthcare PA), Intervenor. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of An Order of the National Labor Relations Board.Charles P. Roberts, III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Clifford H. Nelson Jr. Kellie Isbell
Garvey Marine, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
245 F.3d 819 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 7 timesUpholding Board's decision to enforce bargaining order despite significant turnover among employees after order was issued
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cell Agricultural Manufacturing Co.
41 F.3d 389 (8th Cir. 1994) Cited 10 timesConcluding that “overwhelming evidence” showed the certified unit was inappropriate and the record “support[ed] only one plausible conclusion”—that the appropriate bargaining unit needed to include other employees
Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004) Cited 2 timesNo. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)
Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness
Fed. R. Evid. 803 Cited 12,987 times 85 Legal AnalysesRecognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities
Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 160 Cited 7,062 times 23 Legal AnalysesFinding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB
Rule 807 - Residual Exception
Fed. R. Evid. 807 Cited 1,617 times 11 Legal AnalysesRequiring "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" under the residual exception to the hearsay rule