§

Associated Spring Corp.

110 N.L.R.B. 660 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Associated Spring Corp.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,506 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

  2. Labor Board v. Waterman S.S. Co.

    309 U.S. 206 (1940)   Cited 219 times
    Granting passes to one of two rival unions to go aboard ship to contact men

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Colgate Co. v. Labor Board

    338 U.S. 355 (1949)   Cited 36 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued November 17, 1949. Decided December 5, 1949. An employer and a labor organization entered into a closed-shop agreement which was valid under the National Labor Relations Act and under state law. The agreement, which the employer had entered into in good faith, was of indefinite duration and had been in effect more than four years. Pursuant to the agreement, upon the demand of the labor organization and in good

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Container

    211 F.2d 525 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times
    In National Container Corp. the Second Circuit, applying the Board rules, held that an employer had interfered with the employees' organizational rights and given the incumbent union unlawful support by entering into a collective bargaining agreement following the incumbent's victory in a Board election, but at a time when the rival union's objections to the election were still pending before the National Labor Relations Board.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  7. McQuay-Norris Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    116 F.2d 748 (7th Cir. 1940)   Cited 29 times

    No. 7269. December 23, 1940. Petition for Review of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the McQuay-Norris Manufacturing Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board requested enforcement of its order. Request for enforcement allowed. Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer Boyd and Paul Y. Davis, all of Indianapolis, Ind. (Kurt F. Pantzer, of Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel), for petitioner. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before EVANS and

  8. Harrison Sheet Steel v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    194 F.2d 407 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 15 times
    In Harrison Sheet Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 194 F.2d 407, the company recognized a union which had just lost an election, and obviously did not represent a majority of the employees, when there were two other unions trying to organize the plant.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Spiewak

    179 F.2d 695 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 14 times

    No. 9875. Argued March 24, 1949. Reargued May 16, 1949 and December 1, 1949. Decided February 2, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 11, 1950. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Gerald H. Chambers, New York City (Chambers Chambers, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, O'CONNELL, KALODNER

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Crowley's Milk Co.

    208 F.2d 444 (3d Cir. 1953)   Cited 10 times

    No. 11061. Argued September 18, 1953. Decided November 13, 1953. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1953. Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Marcus Manoff, Philadelphia, Pa. (Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish Green, Philadelphia, Pa., Lloyd C. Anderson, Binghamton, on the brief), for respondent. Before