3 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec. Wkrs
405 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1968) Cited 25 timesIn NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 405 F.2d at 162, this court held that only that part of a contract that exceeds the limits of the construction industry provision is negated.
District No. 9 v. N.L.R.B
315 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Cited 24 timesNo. 16901. Argued September 27, 1962. Decided November 15, 1962. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations
N.L.R.B. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
331 F.2d 712 (3d Cir. 1964) Cited 5 timesNo. 14480. Argued December 3, 1963. Decided May 14, 1964. Stephen Goldberg, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Attys., National Labor Relations Bd., on the brief), for petitioner. Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, for respondents. Before STALEY, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. GANEY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before the Court upon petition of the National Labor