§

Associated Musicians of Greater New York

110 N.L.R.B. 2166 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Associated Musicians of Greater New York

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  3. Carpenters Union v. Ritter's Cafe

    315 U.S. 722 (1942)   Cited 174 times
    Upholding state law outlawing secondary picketing

  4. United Brick Clay Workers v. Deena Artware

    198 F.2d 637 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 49 times
    In Deena Artware, "Whoever shall be injured" was applicable to the primary employer upon which the union attempted to force their acceptance as representatives of the primary employer's employees.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C

    191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 44 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating § 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."

  6. Printing Specialties & Paper Converters Union v. Le Baron

    171 F.2d 331 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 36 times

    No. 11894. December 13, 1948. Rehearing Denied January 19, 1949. Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge. Proceeding by Howard F. Le Baron, Regional Director of the Twenty-First Region of the National Labor Relations Board, on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, against Printing Specialties and Paper Converters Union, Local 388, A.F.L., and another, to enjoin alleged unfair labor practices in violation

  7. Joliet Con. Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    202 F.2d 606 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times
    In Joliet Contractors Assn. v. Labor Board, 202 F.2d 606, cert. denied, 346 U.S. 824, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a glaziers' union boycott of preglazed sashes to preserve work they had traditionally performed was an unfair labor practice under § 8(b)(4).

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Denver Bldg

    193 F.2d 421 (10th Cir. 1952)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4171. January 4, 1952. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Fannie M. Boyls, and Julius G. Serot, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Philip Hornbein, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondents. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding in which the Board seeks enforcement of its order against Denver Building and Construction

  9. Elliott v. General Drivers, Etc.

    123 F. Supp. 125 (S.D. Tex. 1954)   Cited 4 times

    Civ. A. No. 8006. May 7, 1954. Chas. M. Henderson, Washington, D.C., and Dr. Edwin A. Elliott, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner. L.G. Clinton, Jr., Houston, Tex., for respondent Union. Robert C. Eckhardt, Houston, Tex., for respondent Miller. CONNALLY, District Judge. This is an action by Edwin A. Elliott, National Director of the Sixteenth Region of the N.L.R.B., for temporary injunction to retain the status quo pending final determination by the Board with respect to a controversy presently pending

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Const. Wkrs

    198 F.2d 391 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 4 times

    No. 6433. Argued June 24, 1952. Decided July 18, 1952. Writ of Certiorari Denied November 10, 1952. See 73 S.Ct. 170. Thomas McDermott, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Hillis Townsend and M.E. Boiarsky, Charleston, W. Va., for respondents. Before