§

Associated Machines, Inc.

114 N.L.R.B. 390 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Associated Machines, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. National Labor Relations Bd. v. J.I. Case Co.

    201 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 22 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Case Co. (201 F.2d 597, 600), in a situation arising under the National Labor Relations Act, the court pointed out that: "no statutory purpose would be served by requiring formal proof at the hearing of the substantiality of the Union's claim to representation or by permitting the contending parties to litigate such issue at the hearing.

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Indianapolis N

    210 F.2d 501 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 19 times

    No. 11002. February 19, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Louis Schwartz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dean E. Denlinger, Atty., N.L.R.B., Dayton, Ohio, for petitioner. Frederic D. Anderson, Howard J. Cofield, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer Boyd, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DUFFY and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board filed this petition for enforcement

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Acme Mattress Co.

    192 F.2d 524 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 10441. November 7, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gerald F. Krassa, Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Isadore Katz, David Jaffe, New York City, for respondent. Before KERNER, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order entered on October 18, 1950, against respondents

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Spiewak

    179 F.2d 695 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 14 times

    No. 9875. Argued March 24, 1949. Reargued May 16, 1949 and December 1, 1949. Decided February 2, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 11, 1950. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Gerald H. Chambers, New York City (Chambers Chambers, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, O'CONNELL, KALODNER

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Associated Machines

    219 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 8 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Associated Machines, 219 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1955), this court refused to enforce a Board order against an employer that had formed an employee committee with elected representatives that discussed with management "production problems, plant efficiency... and other problems of mutual interest."

  7. National Labor Bd. v. Standard Steel Spring

    180 F.2d 942 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 10 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Standard Steel Spring Co., 180 F.2d 942, 946, this court also had occasion to pass upon the question of the recognition by an employer of a union as bargaining representative, where another union, which had previously been selected by the employees, had thereafter lost its majority status.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Flotill Products

    180 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1950)   Cited 9 times

    No. 11449. February 24, 1950. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Paul St. Sure, Edward H. Moore, Oakland, Cal., Jefferson E. Peyser, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Tobriner Lazarus, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenors. Before MATHEWS, HEALY, and POPE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This is a proceeding upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Corning Glass Works

    204 F.2d 422 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 6 times

    No. 4711. Heard April 8, 1953. Decided May 21, 1953. Thomas R. Haley, Seymour, Ind., Atty., N.L.R.B. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L. R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. W.D. Armour, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Nicholas Unkovic and Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for Corning Glass Works, respondent. Joseph A. Robie, Donald W. Fisher and Mulholland, Robie

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Spitzer Motor Sales

    211 F.2d 235 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 2 times

    No. 203, Docket 22853. Argued March 10, 1954. Decided March 24, 1954. Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Arthur Kaplan, New York City, for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA, and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The objections raised to enforcement