Associated General Contractors of California, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support
  2. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"
  3. American Bread Company v. N.L.R.B

    411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 34 times
    In American Bread, it was physically possible for consumers to bring their own bread or go without, just as it was possible for Kroger shoppers to bring their own bags or go without.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Irvin

    475 F.2d 1265 (3d Cir. 1973)   Cited 28 times
    Denying enforcement of a bargaining order in light of length of time between end of projects to which order applied and court's decision
  5. Suburban Transit Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    499 F.2d 78 (3d Cir. 1974)   Cited 11 times
    In Suburban Transit Corp. v. NLRB, 499 F.2d 78 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1089, 95 S.Ct. 681, 42 L.Ed.2d 682 (1974), this court denied enforcement to the part of the Board's order that held Suburban to have violated sections 8(a)(1), (2) and (3) by bargaining and entering into the collective bargaining agreement with the UTU.
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Air Master Corporation

    339 F.2d 553 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 18 times

    No. 14777. Argued September 22, 1964. Decided December 14, 1964. Melvin Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert E. Wachs, Wolf, Block, Schorr Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., for Air Master Corp. and others Saul C. Waldbaum, Philadelphia, Pa., for Union. Before HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Peter Paul, Inc.

    467 F.2d 700 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 6 times

    No. 71-1397. August 1, 1972. Rehearing Denied November 14, 1972. Charles Steele, Atty. (argued), William Wachter, Joseph E. Mayer, Attys., Dominic L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Atty. Gen., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, NLRB, Region 20, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Robert J. Scolnik (argued), San Francisco, Cal., Marvin S. Siegel (argued), Menlo Park, Cal., Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., Robert B. Snow, Jr.

  8. Playskool, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    477 F.2d 66 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 72-1186, 72-1195. Argued January 22, 1973. Decided March 16, 1973. Rehearing Denied in No. 72-1186 April 23, 1973. As amended April 25, 1973. Francis Heisler, Mark L. Schwartzman, Robert C. Claus, John P. Jacoby, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAIRCHILD and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges

  9. Modine Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.2d 292 (8th Cir. 1971)   Cited 6 times

    No. 20674. December 23, 1971. John D. O'Brien, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, HEANEY and ROSS, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board found that the Modine Manufacturing Company had violated ยงยง 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to bargain with the United Automobile Workers, and that it

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Swift and Company

    294 F.2d 285 (3d Cir. 1961)   Cited 15 times

    No. 13473. Argued April 20, 1961. Decided July 24, 1961. Rehearing Denied August 28, 1961. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Julius G. Getman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Bernard G. Segal, Philadelphia, Pa. (Samuel D. Slade, Shirley S. Bitterman, Schnader, Harrison, Segal Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Ann Leonard, Chicago