Associated General Contractors

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947
  2. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Birmingham Publishing Company

    262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 66 times
    In NLRB v. Birmingham, supra, 262 F.2d at 6-8, an employee requested from company supervisors information on how to transfer to another union.
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston Chronicle

    211 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 54 times
    Subcontracting union work
  5. Morand Bros. Bev. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    190 F.2d 576 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 33 times

    No. 10335. July 23, 1951. Samuel L. Golan, Chester F. McNamara, Leonard W. Golan, all of Chicago, Ill., Golan Golan, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Bernard Dunau, N.L.R.B., all of Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, Benjamin A. Theeman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. George O. Bahrs, San Francisco, Cal., Arthur C. Rooney, Chicago, Ill., Eli E. Dorsey, Seattle, Wash., Robert P. Patterson

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Dalton Brick Tile Corporation

    301 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18765. April 13, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Richard J. Scupi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Erle Phillips, John Bacheller, Jr., Fisher Phillips, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The question presented here is whether, during the time bargaining for a collective

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gottfried Baking

    210 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 24 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gottfried Baking Co., 210 F.2d 772 (2 Cir., 1954), this court considered and rejected the same argument on nearly identical facts: "We think it is unimportant whether or not the Association existed as a formal entity, so long as it is clear that [the employer] acted jointly with other employers in the Association in the negotiation of collective agreements, as the impact upon interstate commerce would be the same in either case."
  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerset Classics

    193 F.2d 613 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 25 times

    No. 58, Docket 22081. Argued December 11, 1951. Decided January 14, 1952. Willis S. Ryza, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Dominick L. Manoli, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Walter J. Mahoney, of Buffalo, N.Y., and George Moskowitz, of New York City, for respondent Somerset Classics, Inc. Aaron L. Danzig

  10. Morand Bros. Bev. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    204 F.2d 529 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 21 times

    No. 10727. May 28, 1953. Samuel L. Golan, Chester F. McNamara and Leonard W. Golan, Chicago, Ill. (Golan Golan, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for petitioner. S.G. Lippman, Fred F. Herzog and Robert Karmel, Chicago, Ill., for amicus curiae. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Mary E. Williamson, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, LINDLEY and