§

Associated Cleaning Consultants & Services, Inc.

226 N.L.R.B. 1066 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Associated Cleaning Consultants & Services, Inc.

21 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  3. Labor Board v. Deena Artware

    361 U.S. 398 (1960)   Cited 139 times
    Ruling that derivative liability could be imposed on the basis of single employer status

  4. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  5. Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 664 (1967)   Cited 29 times
    In Houston Insulation Contractors' Ass'n v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 664, 87 S.Ct. 1278, 18 L.Ed.2d 389 (1967), the Court, relying largely on the reasoning in National Woodwork, held that a work preservation agreement between a company and a local union could be effectuated by another local of the same union.

  6. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  7. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

  8. Heinrich Motors, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    403 F.2d 145 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 30 times
    In Heinrich Motors, Inc. v. NLRB, 403 F.2d 145, 148 (2d Cir. 1968), we characterized the General Counsel's burden as that of "going forward with evidence that the employee has not wilfully incurred a loss of earnings," and cited Mastro Plastics for the proposition.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Buitoni Foods Corp.

    298 F.2d 169 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times

    No. 13534. Argued October 3, 1961. Decided January 15, 1962. Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Joseph S. Oberwager, Newark, N.J., for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. SMITH, Circuit Judge. This is a proceeding under Section 10(e) of the Labor Management

  10. First National Bank of Omaha v. N.L.R.B

    413 F.2d 921 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 20 times

    No. 19356. July 22, 1969. Rehearing Denied August 26, 1969. Clifton L. Elliott and Harry L. Browne, Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner, William E. Morrow, Jr., Omaha, Neb., was on the brief with Clifton L. Elliott, and Harry L. Browne. Robert E. Williams, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Frank H. Itkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief