§

Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc.

331 N.L.R.B. 132 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. California Labor Stds. Enf. v. Dillingham Constr

    519 U.S. 316 (1997)   Cited 741 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that ERISA did not pre-empt a California statute that incentivized, but did not require, plans to follow certain standards for apprenticeship programs

  2. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,569 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  3. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 984 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  4. Fla. Avocado Growers v. Paul

    373 U.S. 132 (1963)   Cited 1,582 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding federal regulation concerning maturity of avocados did not preempt California regulation, where it was not impossible for growers to comply with both regulations

  5. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  6. Machinists v. Wisconsin Emp. Rel. Comm'n

    427 U.S. 132 (1976)   Cited 465 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law is preempted where it would upset the congressionally defined balance of power between management and labor by regulating activity Congress deliberately left unregulated

  7. Longshoremen v. Davis

    476 U.S. 380 (1986)   Cited 320 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "a state court . . . ha no subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the issue . . ., any judgment issued by the state court will be void ab initio"

  8. Brown v. Hotel Employees

    468 U.S. 491 (1984)   Cited 194 times
    Holding that when “state law regulates conduct that is actually protected by federal law ... the federal law must prevail”

  9. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nash-Finch Co.

    404 U.S. 138 (1971)   Cited 163 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that board's attempt to "enjoin" or "restrain" state court injunction fell within exception of 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which forbids court from granting "an injunction to stay" such proceedings unless otherwise authorized

  11. Section 17000 - Short title

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17000   Cited 228 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining 'Unfair Practices Act'