Art's-Way Vessels, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"
  2. Bonnell/Tredegar Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    46 F.3d 339 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 29 times
    Implying Christmas bonus formula into CBA based on employer's prior, long standing conduct
  3. Automotive Council v. N.L.R.B

    483 F.3d 628 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times
    Concluding that substantial evidence supported the NLRB's finding that labor organization "did not have actual or constructive knowledge" of unfair labor practices
  4. Harter Tomato Products Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 934 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 22 times

    No. 96-1326 Argued December 11, 1997 Decided January 23, 1998 Warren Davison argued the cause for petitioner/cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Mary E. Bruno. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent/cross-petitioner. With him on the brief were Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Fred Cornnell, Supervisory Attorney. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of

  5. Seiu, United Healthcare v. National Labor

    574 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 07-73028, 07-73673. Argued and Submitted February 13, 2009. Filed August 3, 2009. David Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for the petitioner-respondent. Julie Broido, Washington, DC, for the respondent-petitioner. Christopher Scanlan, San Francisco, CA, for the intervenor. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 20-CG-65. Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, MARY M. SCHROEDER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. OPINION SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: This union petition for review

  6. Leach Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    54 F.3d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 4 times

    No. 93-1707. Argued March 24, 1995. Decided May 12, 1995. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. William H. Emer, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Kelly F. Watson, Los Angeles, CA. Robert J. Englehart, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda R. Sher, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General

  7. Packing House Indus. Services v. N.L.R.B

    590 F.2d 688 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 77-1691, 77-1726. Submitted October 18, 1978. Decided December 21, 1978. William H. Bruckner, Tate, Bruckner Sykes, Houston, Tex., and Kenneth R. Carr, Grambling, Mounce, Sims, Galatzan Harris, El Paso, Tex., for petitioner. David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., N.L.R.B.,

  8. United Elec., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    223 F.2d 338 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 21 times
    Applying section 8(d) to factory workers engaged in an illegal strike
  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  10. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,316 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355