10 Cited authorities
Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
517 U.S. 781 (1996) Cited 59 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"
Bonnell/Tredegar Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
46 F.3d 339 (4th Cir. 1995) Cited 29 timesImplying Christmas bonus formula into CBA based on employer's prior, long standing conduct
Automotive Council v. N.L.R.B
483 F.3d 628 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 13 timesConcluding that substantial evidence supported the NLRB's finding that labor organization "did not have actual or constructive knowledge" of unfair labor practices
Harter Tomato Products Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
133 F.3d 934 (D.C. Cir. 1998) Cited 22 timesNo. 96-1326 Argued December 11, 1997 Decided January 23, 1998 Warren Davison argued the cause for petitioner/cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Mary E. Bruno. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent/cross-petitioner. With him on the brief were Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Fred Cornnell, Supervisory Attorney. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of
Seiu, United Healthcare v. National Labor
574 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 2 timesNos. 07-73028, 07-73673. Argued and Submitted February 13, 2009. Filed August 3, 2009. David Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for the petitioner-respondent. Julie Broido, Washington, DC, for the respondent-petitioner. Christopher Scanlan, San Francisco, CA, for the intervenor. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 20-CG-65. Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, MARY M. SCHROEDER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. OPINION SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: This union petition for review
Leach Corp. v. N.L.R.B
54 F.3d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1995) Cited 4 timesNo. 93-1707. Argued March 24, 1995. Decided May 12, 1995. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. William H. Emer, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Kelly F. Watson, Los Angeles, CA. Robert J. Englehart, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda R. Sher, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General
Packing House Indus. Services v. N.L.R.B
590 F.2d 688 (8th Cir. 1978) Cited 18 timesNos. 77-1691, 77-1726. Submitted October 18, 1978. Decided December 21, 1978. William H. Bruckner, Tate, Bruckner Sykes, Houston, Tex., and Kenneth R. Carr, Grambling, Mounce, Sims, Galatzan Harris, El Paso, Tex., for petitioner. David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., N.L.R.B.,
United Elec., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B
223 F.2d 338 (D.C. Cir. 1955) Cited 21 timesApplying section 8(d) to factory workers engaged in an illegal strike
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.
444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971) Cited 3 times 3 Legal AnalysesNo. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,314 times 84 Legal AnalysesGranting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355