§

Arthur S. Cook, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

01A15414 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 11, 2002)
Arthur S. Cook, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. West v. Gibson

    527 U.S. 212 (1999)   Cited 115 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "appropriate remedies" in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–16(b) includes remedies not expressly enumerated

  2. Lathem v. Dept. of Ch. and Youth Services

    172 F.3d 786 (11th Cir. 1999)   Cited 198 times
    Holding that a plaintiff’s proffered comparators were valid where all were subject to the same "workplace rules or policies"

  3. Carter v. Duncan-Huggins, Ltd.

    727 F.2d 1225 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the standards used to determine what constitutes a hostile work environment is the same under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981

  4. Miller v. Marsh

    766 F.2d 490 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 59 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding district Court's finding that plaintiff removed herself from the labor market by attending law school because she was not "ready, willing, and available for full-time employment"

  5. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,958 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  6. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,069 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"

  7. Section 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in employment

    42 U.S.C. § 1981a   Cited 4,263 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "additional remedies under Federal law are needed to deter unlawful harassment and intentional discrimination in the workplace"