§

Arthur F. Derse, Sr.

198 N.L.R.B. 998 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Arthur F. Derse, Sr.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wilder Mfg. Co.

    454 F.2d 995 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 20 times
    Transferring petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board to Second Circuit where venue was proper

  5. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dahlstrom M. Door

    112 F.2d 756 (2d Cir. 1940)   Cited 37 times
    Holding that union organizers who simply explained "legitimate consequences" of joining or not joining union did not "threat[en]" employees

  7. Textile Wkrs. Un. of Am., Afl-Cio v. N.L.R.B

    420 F.2d 635 (D.C. Cir. 1969)   Cited 3 times

    No. 22596. Argued October 24, 1969. Decided November 14, 1969. Mr. Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Miss Patricia Eames, General Counsel, Textile Workers Union of America, New York City, Messrs. J. Albert Woll and Thomas E. Harris, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner. Mr. Frank H. Itkin, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of New Jersey, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for respondent. Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel