§

Artcraft Mantel and Fireplace Co.

174 N.L.R.B. 737 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Artcraft Mantel and Fireplace Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

  2. Building Union v. Ledbetter Co.

    344 U.S. 178 (1952)   Cited 12 times
    In Ledbetter, as here, it was claimed that the temporary injunction might well have the practical effect of mooting the underlying dispute, thereby aborting any review of the jurisdictional issue.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. United Mineral Chemical Corp.

    391 F.2d 829 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In United Mineral & Chemical Corp., the Second Circuit stated that the fact-finder could validly conclude based on witness testimony that the theft had not occurred. 391 F.2d at 833.

  4. International Ladies' G.W.U. v. N.L.R.B

    237 F.2d 545 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 12511, 12585. Argued February 3, 1956. Decided May 3, 1956. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in case No. 12511. Mr. Samuel H. Jaffee, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 12511. Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, for respondent in case No. 12511, and petitioner in case No. 12585. Mr. Robert G. Johnson, Attorney, National Labor Relations

  5. Old King Cole v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    260 F.2d 530 (6th Cir. 1958)   Cited 13 times
    Filing petition for review of an order of the Labor Board does not operate as a stay of the Board's order, consistent with Section 10(g) of the NLRA

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mastro Plastics

    214 F.2d 462 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 8 times

    No. 190, Docket 22905. Argued April 8, 1954. Decided July 16, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Harvey B. Diamond, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board, petitioner. Brenner, Butter McVeigh, New York City, Butler, Bennett Fitzpatrick, New York City (Bernard H. Fitzpatrick, New York City, of counsel), for respondents. Before CHASE, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK, Circuit Judges. CHASE, Chief

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Indian Mich. Elec

    124 F.2d 50 (6th Cir. 1941)   Cited 6 times

    No. 8844. December 12, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against the Indiana Michigan Electric Company, respondent, wherein the Michiana Electric Utility Workers Association filed a motion to intervene and respondent made a motion for an order remanding the cause to the board. Cause remanded to the National Labor Relations Board with directions. H.M. Kollender