ART, LLC

23 Cited authorities

  1. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 7,024 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
  2. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.

    508 U.S. 49 (1993)   Cited 1,165 times   42 Legal Analyses
    Holding litigants immune from an antitrust claim under Noerr-Pennington immunity
  3. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 982 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law
  4. Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

    383 U.S. 53 (1966)   Cited 732 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
  5. Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.

    766 N.W.2d 910 (Minn. 2009)   Cited 217 times
    Holding a request for information from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency constituted a "suit" under the policy because failure to respond to the request carried legal consequences
  6. Teamsters Union v. Morton

    377 U.S. 252 (1964)   Cited 254 times
    Holding that although the NLRA neither prohibits nor protects secondary boycotts, which function as a form of self-help available to unions to aid them in reaching their bargaining goals during negotiations, state-law attempts to regulate them are preempted because use of the boycott was part of the balance struck by Congress between the conflicting interests of the union, the employees, the employer, and the community; exceptions are when the type of conduct constitutes an imminent threat to public order or implicates deeply rooted local concerns
  7. Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown Manor

    647 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 1995)   Cited 296 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that furniture company's relationship with its 89,000 past customers was not one upon which a tortious interference claim could be based because the company's hope that some of its past customers would continue to buy furniture from it was mere "speculation"
  8. Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.

    844 N.W.2d 210 (Minn. 2014)   Cited 95 times
    Holding that, to succeed on a tortious interference claim, "a plaintiff must prove ... that the defendant’s tortious interference was intentional and either independently tortious or in violation of a state or federal statute or regulation"
  9. McKee v. Laurion

    825 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. 2013)   Cited 77 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to the falsity of various statements in a defamation case that did not involve a privilege and deciding substantial accuracy as a matter of law
  10. The Ansul Co. v. Uniroyal, Inc.

    404 U.S. 1018 (1972)   Cited 54 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 71-537, 71-539. January 11, 1972, OCTOBER TERM, 1971. Facts and opinion, D.C., 301 F.Supp. 273; 306 F.Supp. 541; 448 F.2d 872. C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 448 F. 2d 872.

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 337,970 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,335 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
  13. Section 187 - Unlawful activities or conduct; right to sue; jurisdiction; limitations; damages

    29 U.S.C. § 187   Cited 710 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing for actions to enforce the prohibitions against secondary boycotts