6 Cited authorities
Lens.Com, Inc. v. 1–800 Contacts, Inc.
686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2012) Cited 8 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Lens.com, the court found that the Lens.com software facilitated the customers' online ordering, providing customers an enhanced consumer experience that provided greater value to Lens.com's online retail services.
In re Dr Pepper Co.
836 F.2d 508 (Fed. Cir. 1987) Cited 19 timesHolding that a contest promoting one's own goods is not an independent service
Application of Orion Research Inc.
669 F.2d 689 (C.C.P.A. 1980) Cited 2 timesAppeal No. 79-622. April 10, 1980. John B. Miller, Cambridge, Mass., attorney of record for appellant; Robert W. Hagopian, Cambridge, Mass., of counsel. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; Fred E. McKelvey and David E. Shallant, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN and MILLER, Judges, and FORD, Judge, Customs Court. Honorable Morgan Ford, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting
Application of Universal Oil Products Co.
476 F.2d 653 (C.C.P.A. 1973) Cited 3 timesPatent Appeal Nos. 8906 and 8933. April 19, 1973. John T. Lanahan, Des Plaines, Ill., of record, for appellant; Sidney W. Russell, Arlington, Va., of counsel. S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; John W. Dewhirst, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and ALMOND, Senior Judge. RICH, Judge. These consolidated appeals are from decisions of the Patent Office
Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification
15 U.S.C. § 1051 Cited 3,806 times 124 Legal AnalysesRequiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark
Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter
15 U.S.C. § 1127 Cited 2,954 times 96 Legal AnalysesGranting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark