Arrow Automotive Industries, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
  4. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
  5. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

    201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Robin American Corporation

    667 F.2d 1170 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 15 times
    Holding a party's argument was not waived when an objection to the Board would have been futile because the decision changing the applicable legal standard and providing the basis for the objection did not come until the case was already before the court of appeals
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Gibraltar Industries, Inc.

    653 F.2d 1091 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 8 times

    No. 78-1474. Argued December 15, 1980. Decided and Filed July 20, 1981. Rehearings and Rehearings En Banc Denied October 7 and October 12, 1981. Elliott Moore, Peter Bernstein, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Richard Cohen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Emil Farkas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Stanley Israel, Kliegman, Israel Cooper, New York City, for respondent. Herbert L. Segal, Irwin H. Cutler, Jr., Kathleen Pellegrino, Louisville, Ky., Max Zimny, Ann Hoffman

  9. Brockway Motor Trucks v. N.L.R.B

    656 F.2d 32 (3d Cir. 1981)   Cited 1 times

    No. 80-2327. Argued July 7, 1981. Decided July 20, 1981. Wilbur C. Creveling, Jr. (argued), Allentown, Pa., for petitioner. Andrew F. Tranovich (argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before ADAMS, VAN DUSEN, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: This proceeding arose as a result of a decision by Brockway Motor Trucks (Division of Mack Trucks, Inc.), in the course of a labor dispute, to close its facility