Armour Oil Co.

17 Cited authorities

Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass
404 U.S. 157 (1971) Cited 632 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 734 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 234 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.
385 U.S. 421 (1967) Cited 117 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
Labor Board v. Burnup Sims
379 U.S. 21 (1964) Cited 106 times 21 Legal Analyses
Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
N.L.R.B. v. Broyhill Company
514 F.2d 655 (8th Cir. 1975) Cited 25 times
In Broyhill, the Eighth Circuit found that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that McWilliams was a supervisor.
Helena Laboratories Corp. v. N.L.R.B
557 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir. 1977) Cited 20 times
No. 76-3077. August 22, 1977. George E. Duncan, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioner-cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen., Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, Atty., Alan Banov, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent-cross petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case). Before THORNBERRY, AINSWORTH and RONEY, Circuit Judges. AINSWORTH, Circuit
N L Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
536 F.2d 786 (8th Cir. 1976) Cited 18 times
No. 75-1714. Submitted March 11, 1976. Decided June 9, 1976. Edward F. Ryan, Carpenter, Bennett Morrissey, Newark, N. J., for petitioner; Irving L. Hurwitz, Newark, N. J., on brief. Anne Libbin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LAY, ROSS and STEPHENSON
International U., United Auto. v. N.L.R.B
455 F.2d 1357 (D.C. Cir. 1971) Cited 21 times
Upholding Board's finding § 8 violation when photographing union activity "continued long after it became apparent that there would be no violence on the picket line"

Armour Oil Co.

17 Cited authorities

Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

In Broyhill, the Eighth Circuit found that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding that McWilliams was a supervisor.

Upholding Board's finding § 8 violation when photographing union activity "continued long after it became apparent that there would be no violence on the picket line"