Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

Radio Officers v. Labor Board

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

Aeronautical Lodge v. Campbell

In Campbell, the Supreme Court held that the Selective Service Act, which required employers to return a veteran to the same position he held prior to entering military service "without loss of seniority" did not render unlawful a clause in the collective-bargaining agreement providing for superseniority for "union chairmen" over veterans in case of layoff.

Labor Board v. News Syndicate Co.

In NLRB v. News Syndicate Co., 365 U.S. 695, 81 S.Ct. 849, 6 L.Ed.2d 29 (1961), where the bargaining unit included supervisors, the NLRB had found that both the employer and the union had committed unfair labor practices by operating an unlawful closed shop and preferential hiring system.

Newspaper Pub. Assn. v. Labor Board

Moynahan v. Pari-Mutuel Employees Guild

In Moynahan v. Pari-Mutuel Employees Guild of California, Local 280, 317 F.2d 209 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 911, 84 S.Ct. 207, 11 L.Ed.2d 150 (1963), this court recognized that the union's requirement that a member receive a two-thirds favorable vote of the current members could hardly be characterized as a mere formality or ministerial act.

Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.

American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Philadelphia Iron Works, Inc.

Noting that hiring practices after a grievance was filed "would be a factor for the board's consideration" but that the NLRB easily could reason that subsequent hiring practices were reactionary to the grievance and did not accurately reflect the prior hiring arrangement