§

Arkansas Grain Corp.

172 N.L.R.B. 1742 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Arkansas Grain Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. Douds v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    241 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 64 times
    In Douds v. International Longshoremen's Association, 241 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1957), we upheld the district court's granting of a preliminary injunction sought by the Board against a union.

  6. W.W. Cross Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    174 F.2d 875 (1st Cir. 1949)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that " 'wages' " in the NLRA "embraces within its meaning direct and immediate economic benefits flowing from the employment relationship covers a group insurance program"

  7. Standard Oil Company v. N.L.R.B

    322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    In Standard Oil Co. v. NLRB, 322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963), four oil refineries of the same company constituted separate bargaining units; one was represented by an international union and the other three by locals thereof.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Arkansas Grain Corporation

    390 F.2d 824 (8th Cir. 1968)   Cited 13 times

    No. 18849. March 12, 1968. Rehearing Denied April 24, 1968. Harold B. Shore, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Glen Bendixsen, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief. B.S. Clark, of Smith, Williams, Friday Bowen, Little Rock, Ark., for respondent. James C. Paradise and Herbert M. Berman, Cincinnati, Ohio

  9. American Radiator S. Sanit. v. N.L.R.B

    381 F.2d 632 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16930. August 8, 1967. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner, William K. Engeman, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief, Austen B. McGregor, New York City, of counsel. Gary Green, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Edith Nash, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., for intervenor